According to accepted science, an infinately dense/hot/spinning point inflated, giving us the known universe and the laws which govern it.
Q:So this spinning dot had properties prior to the laws of nature?
Q:It was dense/spinning/hot relative to what?
Q:What laws governed the mechanism of the expansion?
Q:Don’t this violate thermodynamics?
I think more faith is required to believe this version of events than that of the Intelligent Design folks.
um, no. I beg beg beg you to go out and try to learn about this stuff on your own. you sound somewhat silly spouting off about things that you only have a barest glimmer of an understanding on.
You’re saying that it takes more faith that the universe isn’t 100% understandable than it takes to believe that the universe was created at the drop of the hat by one of many omnipotent forces?
Scientists claim something else?
Please point me toward a resource where I can gain the fuller undertanding you have.
Which question is “silly?”