Nonreligious people are the largest spiritual group in the US. Why don’t we hear more about them?

LGBTQ Nation
By Daniel Villarreal

The post Nonreligious people are the largest spiritual group in the US. Why don’t we hear more about them? appeared first on Freedom From Religion Foundation.

FFRF’s ‘Secular Spotlight’ explores the weird world of AI-generated religion

The latest episode of the Freedom From Religion Foundation’s “Secular Spotlight”  dives into the rapidly expanding world of AI-generated religious content.

FFRF Legal Counsel Chris Line and IT Director Scott Knickelbine welcome Taylor Leigh, known on YouTube as “The Antibot,” to discuss how — from AI Jesus chatbots to fake Christian influencers and political propaganda — artificial intelligence is increasingly being used to spread religious messaging and attract followers online. Leigh walks our hosts through the strange and rapidly growing intersection of religion and AI. The conversation examines how artificial intelligence is reshaping faith, online culture, misinformation and human connection. 

“Why something like ‘Text with Jesus’ has such a good ranking and so many people are downloading it, has to do with the fact that we live in a world that’s increasingly isolated, and when we’re talking about religious folks, religious attendance in the last two decades has declined pretty sharply,” Leigh says. “I think half of religious Americans actually attend church in person on a semi-regular basis, and so I think that there is this connection that a lot of people are longing for and they’re no longer getting it in church.”

You can catch this episode of “Secular Spotlight” on FFRF’s YouTube channel, as well as by watching on your smart TV after downloading FFRF’s free app, Freethought TV, which also highlights FFRF’s other video programming. Our recent episodes include a news bite explaining a charter school victory in Colorado and another one answering viewer questions on Ask An Atheist Day. Make sure you’re subscribed to FFRF’s YouTube channel for all the latest updates!

The Freedom From Religion Foundation is a U.S.-based nonprofit dedicated to defending the constitutional principle of separation between state and church and educating the public on matters relating to nontheism. With more than 41,000 members, FFRF is the largest association of freethinkers (atheists, agnostics and humanists) in North America. For more information, visit ffrf.org.

The post FFRF’s ‘Secular Spotlight’ explores the weird world of AI-generated religion appeared first on Freedom From Religion Foundation.

June 28, 2026 – To Begin the World Over Again: The Life of Thomas Paine (Los Angeles)

Sunday, June 28, 2026

2:00 pm – 4:00 pm
Los Angeles Central Library

Mark Taper Auditorium
630 W 5th St
Los Angeles, CA 90071

Thomas Paine’s ideas changed the world, and his words sparked a revolution. As we celebrate America’s 250th birthday, join us for a theatrical production sharing the story of one of history’s most misunderstood men. Written by and starring Ian Ruskin.

Admission is free. Tickets are not required but encouraged. Reserve your free ticket at Eventbrite.

For ADA accommodations, call (213) 228-7430 at least 72 hours prior to the event.
Para ajustes razonables según la ley de ADA, llama al (213) 228-7430 al menos 72 horas antes del evento.

The post June 28, 2026 – To Begin the World Over Again: The Life of Thomas Paine (Los Angeles) appeared first on Freedom From Religion Foundation.

La. school system heeds FFRF call to ban the Gideons

The Freedom From Religion Foundation has successfully advised a Louisiana school district to bar a religious organization from handing out bibles to its students.

A concerned family member informed the state/church watchdog that on Sept. 26 of last year, Herndon Magnet School (located in Belcher, La.) permitted Gideons International to address students and distribute bibles to youngsters on school grounds during the school day. Gideons International is “an evangelical association that equips and mobilizes Christian business and professional men, along with their wives, to share God’s word, winning others for Jesus worldwide.” Herndon Magnet School’s official Facebook page stated (image above): “We were so thankful to be visited by the Gideon Ministry this morning! They spoke with our 5th graders and offered each student the opportunity to receive a Youth New Testament Bible.” (The post no longer appears on the Herndon Magnet School Facebook page.)
School-sponsored bible distributions are unconstitutional, FFRF reminded the school district.

“It is inappropriate and unconstitutional for Caddo Parish Public Schools to allow outside groups to distribute religious materials to students,” FFRF Legal Fellow Charlotte Gude wrote to Caddo Parish Public Schools Superintendent Keith S. Burton. “By allowing Gideons International to distribute bibles to students, Caddo Parish Public Schools displays blatant favoritism for religion over nonreligion and Christianity above all other faiths. Further, it appears that the school itself hosted and promoted the bible distribution. When school staff encourages young students to take bibles, they run the risk of unconstitutionally coercing students to take, read and reflect upon religious literature.”

Further, FFRF pointed out, this bible distribution and social media promotion needlessly marginalized all students and families who do not practice Christianity. As much as 38 percent of the American population is non-Christian, including the almost 30 percent who are nonreligious. More than half of Generation Z members (those born after 1996) are non-Christian, including the 43 percent who are nonreligious.

FFRF urged that to respect the constitutional rights of students and parents, Caddo Parish Public Schools must cease allowing the Gideons International and any other organizations to distribute bibles or other religious literature to students. Its call did not go unheeded.

“Please be advised that the staff at Herndon Magnet School has been advised to not allow the Gideons to distribute bibles during the school day at school,” the general counsel for the Caddo Parish School Board recently replied in an email.

FFRF is pleased that its appeal to follow the Constitution fell on receptive ears.

“Religious groups and individuals should not be given access to a captive audience of vulnerable young children,” comments FFRF Co-President Annie Laurie Gaylor. “Religious instruction belongs with parents, not strangers exploiting our public schools. We’re glad officials realized the impropriety of this when we raised concerns.”

The Freedom From Religion Foundation is a national nonprofit organization with over 41,000 members across the country, including more than 100 members in Louisiana. Its purposes are to protect the constitutional principle of separation between state and church, and to educate the public on matters relating to nontheism. 

The post La. school system heeds FFRF call to ban the Gideons appeared first on Freedom From Religion Foundation.

FFRF pushes back against wave of Texas Ten Commandments displays

The Freedom From Religion Foundation is objecting to a new Ten Commandments monument outside Amarillo City Hall — the second such display in Texas that it has recently confronted.

The state/church watchdog has sent a letter to the Amarillo mayor and City Council members contending that statements made during the monument’s dedication ceremony describing the biblical monument in explicitly religious terms demonstrate the display serving a religious purpose. Monument coordinator Trent Morgan stated that “all laws are based on a moral code and they come from the bible” and said the monument reflects “who we are as a people.” Morgan also said that the display was intended to encourage future generations to believe in God and understand that they were created “in His image.” During the ceremony, attendees prayed and proclaimed that Amarillo was being claimed for the Lord: “We’re claiming this city for the Lord. No devil’s going to come in here and take his heart, because we’re going to stand up, we’re going to fight for this city.”

Such statements undermine any claim that this monument was installed for a so-called historical purpose. Furthermore, FFRF Co-President Annie Laurie Gaylor notes, “There is no historic purpose for a city or other U.S. entity to display the Ten Commandments. These biblical edicts are not part of U.S. history, our Declaration of Independence, much less our godless Constitution, whose only references to religion are exclusionary.”

FFRF Legal Counsel Chris Line has written to Amarillo Mayor Cole Stanley: “Displaying the Ten Commandments in front of City Hall is not only an unconstitutional display of favoritism toward religion, it needlessly marginalizes and excludes city residents who do not share the religious beliefs that the Ten Commandments embody and represent.”

The recent push to install Ten Commandments monuments on government property in Texas is a troubling trend.

“Public officials who seek to use government institutions to promote religious messages should be censured. They have no business telling citizens how many gods to worship, which gods to worship or whether to worship any gods at all!” says Gaylor. “The First Commandment is a clear and egregious violation of the First Amendment.”

FFRF notes that the Amarillo monument comes on the heels of its separate challenge to a Ten Commandments display in Rockwall County just a few days ago.

FFRF explains that government-sponsored Ten Commandments displays alienate residents who do not share the religious beliefs represented by the monument and conflict with the constitutional principle that government must remain neutral on matters of religion. It is asking Amarillo officials to remove the monument and respect the rights of conscience of all city residents.

The Freedom From Religion Foundation is a national nonprofit organization with over 41,000 members and several chapters nationwide, including more than 1,700 members and a chapter in Texas. FFRF’s purposes are to defend the constitutional principle of separation between church and state, and to educate the public on matters relating to nontheism.

The post FFRF pushes back against wave of Texas Ten Commandments displays appeared first on Freedom From Religion Foundation.

Red Pen Logic Called This Atheist Argument Incoherent… He Was Wrong

“Swallow it!”: A Christian “prophet” told a teen to eat a Bible page to receive God’s blessings

This newsletter is free and goes out to over 24,000 subscribers, but it’s only able to sustain itself due to the support I receive from a small percentage of regular readers. Would you please consider becoming one of those supporters? You can subscribe via Patreon or the Subscribe button below! You can also make one-time donations through Venmo or PayPal.

Subscribe now

A Christian “prophet” has just invented a new way for someone to receive God’s blessings: physically eating the Bible.

During a February event at “The ROCK,” a non-denominational megachurch in Parkersburg, West Virginia, Kevin Leal ripped a page out of a Bible and then told a teenager to eat it.

The segment was first brought to my attention by the Christian website Protestia.

… Is there a teenager that has a paper Bible here? Not your phone, but it’s a paper—it’s a Bible?

… [To an aide: Turn to the Book of Proverbs for me.] You won’t believe what I’m about to do. But it happened 15 years ago in Brazil… [Rips out page]. Eat it. When you eat this, the power of God is going to go inside of you. Go ahead. Take your time.

… Swallow it! The power of God’s coming on ya! The power of God’s coming on ya! The power of God’s coming on ya! Swallow it! You want some water? Give him my water.

… Father, mark him for the rest of his life. For wisdom is coming over your whole body right now. Raise the music up. It’s coming on. Just receive it right now, son. This is a life-changing anointing just happening to you. I see you with houses before other people have houses.

Usually, when people rip pages out of the Bible and destroy them, Christians consider it blasphemy, but who knew that it was acceptable during a supposed anointing? And who could have guessed Catholics won this particular battle when they decided to go with a bland wafer instead?

Obviously, this is all bullshit, but it’s a reminder of how religious leaders can convince gullible people to do damn near anything in the name of God. Leal brought this kid up in front of the audience before demanding he do something completely embarrassing. There was pressure and coercion—and emotional manipulation, too. Notice how Leal literally called for the music to get louder. The full clip also shows the audience being told to cheer this on with cries of “Wisdom to build.”

I don’t blame the kid for going along with it; it was arguably more embarrassing to say no in that situation. But we can absolutely blame the adults for playing along with this charade.

This was a stupid stunt. There’s no shortage of stupid stunts when it comes to so-called “prophets” trying to prove God is working His magic in the church. The best thing we can say about this stunt is that it didn’t involve rubbing spit on someone’s face or any kind of animal cruelty. It was a relatively harmless form of batshittery. Hell, it’s not even the worst thing a religious leader has ever done involving a child’s mouth.

Maybe you’re wondering where this idea even came from.

Lucky for you, we have that answer. A few minutes before Leal told that child to swallow, The ROCK pastor David Chisholm told that same kid he had a dream about him, involving the teenager sitting at a table and devouring the Bible:

… I saw you sitting at a table—a dinner table—knife, fork, spoon, and laying in front of you was a Bible. And it was open to the Book of Proverbs.

And I seen you reach down and you took Chapter 1, and you tore it out, and you crumpled it up, and you put it in your mouth, and you chewed it, and you swallowed it.

And then you went to Chapter 2. You tore it out of the Bible, you crumpled it up, put it in your mouth and swallowed it.

And I’m giving you a command: Every day, for the next several years in your development, you eat at least one chapter of the Book of Proverbs, the Book of Ecclesiastes, and the Book of Psalms, in at least 10 different translations. Find 10 different versions. And eat a chapter a day, because you’re gonna have to have the wisdom of God to do this call that God’s got on your life.

I did that when I was young. I read the Book of Proverbs, I devoured it. And, you know, when I was 26, I had 70-year-old men sitting at my desk for counsel, saying, “Why am I in front of you? You should be in front of me.” Amen? Amen? Deal? Book of Proverbs every day.

That’s… weird. But at least it’s just a metaphor. Chisholm was clearly telling the kid to read certain parts of the Bible regularly.

But Leal then took his language and just ran with it. Because when Fundies say you have to take the Bible literally, you have to take the Bible literally.

As one commenter said in response, that kid’s a day away from having the Holy Shits.

While people are rightly mocking this whole charade, let’s remember the real problem: This church is conditioning young people to believe what religious leaders say no matter how idiotic or harmful it may be. To them, obedience must always override their own instincts, dignity, or common sense. If you can train young people to do that, you’re creating an environment where every other form of spiritual abuse can also flourish.

So, yes, we can laugh at this spectacle. But we should also condemn it because no ethical person should be relying on a public pressure campaign to convince a child to do something this idiotic. It’s a perfect snapshot of performative Christianity: manipulative, exploitative, and desperate. And deeply, deeply unhealthy.

Colorado GOP candidate’s wildest religious claims unravel in must-watch interview

This newsletter is free and goes out to over 24,000 subscribers, but it’s only able to sustain itself due to the support I receive from a small percentage of regular readers. Would you please consider becoming one of those supporters? You can subscribe via Patreon or the Subscribe button below! You can also make one-time donations through Venmo or PayPal.

Subscribe now

The Republican front-runner in the race to be Colorado’s governor is Victor Marx, a man who seemingly came out of nowhere to jump past the rest of the field. But his background as a Christian ministry leader is coming under close scrutiny given the apparent lies he’s been telling voters about it.

Marx is a MAGA cultist with a massive social media following who’s never run for public office before, but with a boost from conspiracy theorist Rep. Lauren Boebert and a history of serving in the Marine Corps and working as a former assistant to now-dead anti-LGBTQ bigot James Dobson at Focus on the Family, he was the sort of candidate conservatives could rally behind:

Marx is the founder of the All Things Possible ministry, a nonprofit organization based in Colorado Springs that funds projects against child exploitation. He is a first-time candidate and is endorsed by Boebert. He has raised nearly $620,000 since announcing his candidacy at the start of the year.

“Colorado does not need another politician,” he said “We need a leader.”

“Businesses are leaving (the state), families are suffering and leaving, and when we’re letting criminals out but keeping a grandmother who is a Gold Star mom in prison — that’s got to stop,” he said.

(He was referring to convicted felon and election denier Tina Peters, who was later granted clemency by the Democratic Gov. Jared Polis for reasons that defy all logic.)

The thing about a relatively unknown candidate, though, is that it raises the possibility that digging into his past could unveil surprises. Sometimes that takes investigative journalists truly probing into someone’s life. Sometimes it just takes asking basic questions about someone’s biography.

Marx wasn’t even ready for those basic questions.

Consider the biography that appeared on his campaign website after it launched:

Victor is not a career politician—he is a Marine, a humanitarian, and a problem solver. He founded All Things Possible Ministries, which has helped more than 45,000 women and children recover from abuse, trafficking, and violence. He has led over 150 high-risk humanitarian missions across the globe to rescue the vulnerable and partnered with law enforcement through a task force of retired intelligence and cyber experts to track predators and protect children. In Colorado Springs, he built a training and retreat center serving veterans, law enforcement, and first responders. Through these efforts, Victor has earned the trust of sheriffs, military leaders, and government officials because he knows how to unite people, cut through bureaucracy, and deliver results.

In 2024, he repeated a similar claim when promoting his book, saying he wrote it “after 130+ missions to rescue women & children from terror & abuse.”

This past February, he said in a campaign newsletter that his team “rescued 43 children from the grips of evil predators.” No further details were offered.

He also said in a 2015 interview about his ministry that, as a seven-year-old child, his abusive stepfather made him kill another man, an event that (obviously) traumatized him but also helped shape who he is today in terms of what he hopes to stop for future generations.

These days, Marx isn’t the sort of person to sit for interviews that aren’t with propaganda outlets, so it was an interesting choice that he sat for an in-depth conversation with Kyle Clark of 9NEWS, a reporter with an excellent track record (and a decent dude). It came ahead of a scheduled debate between the Republican candidates for governor.

Clark asked Marx if he could verify a lot of the stories he’s been sharing—the hundred-plus missions, and thousands of rescues, and if he’s killed any more people—and things went off the rails quickly.

Like that 45,000 rescues number, which has since been pulled from the campaign website:

CLARK: One claim that you make as central to your life story and your accomplishments, to me, stands out above all of the others. And it’s about saving women and children… Your campaign website falsely claimed that you had rescued more than 45,000 women and children, and that claim has since been taken down. How many women and children have you rescued from captivity and abuse?

MARX: Well, regarding the 45,000, is that the number you’re making reference to? Never did I ever say that I rescued 45,000 women and children. And I mean, I’ve been doing this for years. Our ministry website never claimed that. Our current campaign website doesn’t say it. I think what happened, the best that we can see, is an independent contractor put together our first, you know, website for the campaign, and then that individual inadvertently put “rescued.” And it was corrected as soon as we knew.

CLARK: So, mistakes happen. I understand that. How many women and children have you rescued?

MARX: We’ve never publicly given the number out for security reasons. And we don’t have a need to. I would say it’s more than one and less than a bunch. Our desire is to protect those that we have in our current network that’s in place, so there’s no benefit from us.

CLARK: Giving a number would put people in danger?

MARX: Yes.

CLARK: How does the number put people in danger?

MARX: Um, I think if those that we’ve disrupted, nefarious characters and organizations, had the number, it would put us and our network at much greater risk than we are now.

That answer obviously makes no sense whatsoever. It also doesn’t explain where the number came from in the first place.

Clark rightly pointed out that if it’s dangerous to tell people about how many victims the ministry is rescuing, why tell people that they saved “43 children from the grips of evil predators” earlier this year? That was a reference to a rescue by U.S. Marshals, but in their press release announcing the accomplishment, the government listed 25 agencies and groups that helped them do it. Marx’s group wasn’t on the list.

CLARK: You certainly do use specific rescue numbers though when you feel that it suits your purposes. You wrote in February of this year, “Just last month, our team rescued 43 children from the grips of evil predators.” Where did that rescue of 43 children happen?

MARX: In the U.S., and that was by, through, and with law enforcement, through a special operations that we do with Protecting Children’s Innocence.

CLARK: Are you referring to Operation Northern Lights in Florida?

MARX: Yes.

CLARK: Okay. So the U.S. Marshals named 25 partner agencies, including two rescue ministries, that were involved in that operation. They said nothing about you and your ministry. But you’re claiming credit for those 43 rescues. They didn’t even mention you.

MARX: Yeah, not credit. Participation [is] what we do.

CLARK: You said “our team rescued 43 children,” and the marshals who ran that operation named 25 partners and never said a word about you.

MARX: Does that mean we didn’t help them?

CLARK: No, I’m just curious why you think that is.

MARX: Uh, we don’t require that we be listed or named in any operations.

The idea that a ministry that raises money from touting its success didn’t want credit for a major success is incomprehensible. It suggests that, at best, Marx’s group has a very very tangential connection to something he later pretended to take full credit for.

What about the “130+ missions to rescue women & children from terror & abuse”?

Marx didn’t even appear to know what Clark was talking about:

CLARK: You said that you’ve performed more than 130 “missions to rescue women and children from terror and abuse.” Is what you said factually true? That you have performed more than 130 missions to rescue women and children from terror?

MARX: Where do you cite that?

CLARK: Uh, you said that on X on August 12th of 2024.

MARX: That’s not something I believe I would ever say.

CLARK: Your full quote was, “I wrote this book, Dangerous Gentleman, after 130+ missions to rescue women and children from terror and abuse.” So that’s not true what you wrote?

MARX: I wouldn’t… That doesn’t sound accurate… that I would specify how many missions…

Ooof.

At this point, we’re not even 10 minutes into the interview. Clark makes clear that, as with any politician, he just wants a way to confirm the numbers being put out by the campaign, but the only material “supporting” Marx’s claims come from Marx himself. There’s no way to talk to survivors they’ve supposedly rescued or officials who can verify his group’s involvement. Marx seems shocked that, for once, people aren’t taking his claims at face value. Which is the sort of thing that happens when you’re not speaking to people inside your Christian echo chamber.

Clark later asked a question that should have been a gimme.

Regarding the man Marx supposedly killed at age seven, has he ever killed anyone else?

The answer was not “No.”

CLARK: Your claim that your abusive stepfather forced you to kill a man when you were seven years old. Is that the only person you’ve ever killed?

MARX: Well, I would say as a, as a child, yes, I mean, without question. But I’ve been in other situations where, you know, possibly people or persons died, as a result of me defending myself and other countries… There’s no count on that, and I… there’s no photos or… But that was something, as a kid, without a, without a doubt. Yeah.

CLARK: Do you think that you’ve killed people as an adult?

MARX: Does it matter?

CLARK: Yeah, I’d say so.

MARX: Why?

CLARK: Killing somebody is a pretty weighty thing.

MARX: If someone’s trying to kill you or you’re in combat?

CLARK: It’s still… it’s still a weighty thing to take somebody else’s life. I mean, it could be self-defense, it could be justified, but it’s still a weighty thing. So I’m just asking you, how many people have you killed?

MARX: Well, if I did, I wouldn’t be telling a reporter.

All he had to do was say he may have (or has) killed people in war, but his hesitation in saying something that could have been simple raises more questions than answers.

(Gov. Polis took the opportunity to dunk on Marx for that response: “I have killed zero people, and you can take that to the bank.”)

Clark brought up a different claim that Marx once “called in a US military airstrike that killed 70 ISIS fighters,” which a civilian can’t do. Marx refused to elaborate on that.

What about a claim that he caught child traffickers at the U.S.-Mexico border and “made them pay a price”? He said his ministry was working with the National Guard and the border patrol… but couldn’t detail his group’s actual involvement.

My favorite exchange, though, was when Clark asked Marx to simply explain the idea of exorcisms, which is something Marx has discussed multiple times in front of Christian audiences. But whenever you have to explain religious nonsense to a secular audience, you come face-to-face with the reality that nothing you’re saying makes any sense. And you could see Marx grappling with that realization in real time:

CLARK: You perform exorcisms, commanding demons to come out of people. Can you explain to me how that works?

MARX: When you say I perform exorcisms…

CLARK: Yeah, you described yourself as a “reluctant exorcist,” right?

MARX: Yeah…

CLARK: Describe to me how your exorcisms work when you command demons out.

MARX: Well, that’s a joke, the way I say that, but as a follower of Christ and someone who’s very familiar with evil that’s been both forced upon me as a kid and then seeing the effects of it in humans’ lives, I believe the word of God that I can pray for people and see people set free from—whether it’s demonic oppression, I never call it possession. I believe there’s levels of demonization where people are suffering because of evil.

CLARK: But could you explain to folks who have never witnessed this, don’t understand how it works. I’ve heard you describe it a number of times. You’ve got the two angels with the swords. You’ve got the circle of judgment. And you command the demons out of someone. Can you explain to folks how that works so they can hear you describe it?

MARX: Well, I don’t command the demons to come out of someone. I think of them as assignments, or attachments, to people. And we identify the demon, like Jesus did, we ask what their name is, and then we give them commands, and they very frequently and typically will answer through the person’s mind. They’ll tell us what they hear, and then we destroy them, banish them, to perfect judgment from Christ.

CLARK: You also perform these exorcisms by phone. Are those just as effective?

MARX: They are.

I love the genre of questions where Christians running for office are asked to explain their most basic beliefs. They always come off looking like delusional fools—two angels with the swords! The circle of judgment!—and even though Marx sidesteps the question at first, his eventual answer doesn’t make him sound any more rational. The fact that all of this can be done over the phone is comically hilarious and shows just how much of a scam the whole idea is.

Clark wasn’t asking those questions, though, to mock Christianity. He was asking because Marx sold exorcisms as part of a larger $99 “spiritual warfare” guide (no longer available on his website) and in a film called “The Unseen War” (still available). But he insisted he doesn’t charge for the service. But it’s certainly part of a larger package of religious bullshit that he definitely does sell to those who can afford it.

Clark’s final question, after all this: “Do you understand why so many of your critics think you’re a con man?”

Marx’s response: “No.”

It’s just an incredible interview because it shows what happens when a religious zealot with a history of selling exaggerations to build himself up attempts to break free of the Christian bubble by seeking higher office, only to be confronted with basic questions that Christians themselves rarely, if ever, dare to ask people in a position of spiritual authority.

Whether it’ll make any different in the GOP primary election on June 30 is up for debate. Though the lies and evasion seen in this interview aren’t limited to questions about his biography. There have been plenty of serious questions raised about campaign finance and his team’s inability to file a report that makes any sense.

The contribution side contained so many errors that the campaign requested to “un-file” and replace the filing altogether. The secretary of state permitted it — despite calling the request “not a common practice.”

The refiled version corrected hundreds of address errors while materially altering contribution totals by adding nearly $3,000 in previously unreported contributions.

But more than $35,000 in excess contributions from 56 different donors apparently still haven’t been returned — despite the campaign’s assurances they’d comply with state law — including one donor who totaled $5,000 across five donations, more than three times Colorado’s $1,450 donation limit.

There’s a very good chance Marx could be the next Republican nominee for governor, but everything that’s come out about him shows you exactly why he has no business running a ministry, much less running a state. He lives in a bubble where money can always be raised by lying or exaggerating about your life. More than that, his responses suggest he’s not used to having to defend his own biography.

If he can’t be trusted to own up to things he currently believes, how the hell can he be trusted to look after people he actively thinks are evil? After all, plenty of Christians think LGBTQ people are possessed by demons or that opposition to Christian Nationalism is a form of spiritual warfare that must be defeated.

There was one interesting postscript to all this from commentator Ross Kaminsky:

Although I did not see it myself and can’t find it now, I’m told that the first social media post from the Marx team about the interview was that it was tough but fair. It seems that the negative reaction to Marx (in the comments to the post) was more than they could handle, though, and the post was deleted and replaced with one that claimed “selective editing.” It is true that the full 29-minute interview was edited down to something like 7 or 8 minutes for the air but I think if you watch the entire thing (at the top of this note), you won’t find any part of it in which Marx comes across as being truthful. Seriously, none of it. A body language expert would have a field day.

If Marx ends up being the nominee, it could be the greatest gift Democrats could have asked for. A Republican gubernatorial candidate debate is scheduled for June 2, hosted by 9NEWS. There seems to be speculation that Marx will skip it, but he hasn’t confirmed that.

Trinity Macarthur

TRINITY MACARTHUR is currently a legal intern with FFRF for the summer of 2026. She is from Colorado and received a BA in history and political science from CU Boulder. She is currently attending Penn State Dickinson Law, University Park and will serve as the Executive Research Editor for the Penn State Dickinson Law Review next year. Trinity enjoys reading, going to see orchestras play, and nice, cool weather.

The post Trinity Macarthur appeared first on Freedom From Religion Foundation.

Red Pen Logic Called This Atheist Argument Incoherent… He Was Wrong